Blacks vs. Non-Blacks: Race Relations Forever Fractured? Part 1
Author’s Note: In this 2 part blog piece, Tessler first examines the use of the Obama race card and in Part 2 will then review the Obamaland brand of racism.
Part 1: Obama Burned By His Own Race Card
Race relations in the United States has taken a decidedly wrong turn. People describe it as a black vs. white situation. That’s an incorrect description. It is more of a black vs. non-black situation. We hardly hear of such controversy in regard to white vs. Asian; white vs. Hispanic or white vs. any-other-race. It seems like it is always black vs. non-blacks.
Prior to the election of Barack Hussein Obama as President, race relations in the United States were improving. Progress had been slow, there is no denying that. But it was progress. And that progress over the decades had been so successful that a majority of non-black voters in the United States could see past the color of Obama’s skin and vote for him, making him the first black person ever elected President of the United States. Despite the fact I knew America had voted in a socialist as President, I was still proud of our country for having the ability to see past the skin color.
Today, the issue of the color of one’s skin, and how folks react to it, is front and center. It is the burning issue of the Obama Administration. An issue that is going to politically burn him. He was supposed to have a post-racial presidency. Now, nothing could be further from the truth.
- White policeman arrests black professor: Obama butts into that situation by saying the white man “acted stupidly.”
- Tea Party activists at a Washington, D.C. rally: Accused by Obama supporters of hurling racial expletives and spiting on a black man. But no one can produce one piece of evidence that ever happened.
- Obama’s Justice Department: Patently refuses to pursue voter intimidation charges against members of the New Black Panthe Party and a whistle blower says it was because the DOJ refuses to prosecute blacks for civil rights violations
- Obama’s Justice Department: Sues the State of Arizona about their immigration reform laws and alienates all non-black voters who support the law.
- NAACP: Condemns elements within the Tea Party Movement for racism but conveniently overlooks any New Black Panther, Jeremiah Write or Farrakhan racism.
- Shirley Sherrod: A black person fired by the Agriculture Department’s Secretary, Tom Vilsack, with the support of the White House. But then Vilsack and the White House think they need to “eat crow” and apologize to her, even though a study of the full video clearly shows she’s talking to a racist group from the NAACP.
“Division and tension between black and white Americans has cropped up repeatedly over Obama’s 18 months in office, hurting his popularity and distracting from his political agenda.” – Race issues beset Obama’s “post-racial” presidency
The tactics of the Obama Administration and its supporters, which includes the NAACP, have been to play the race card over and over again in the hopes of solidifying support from the very people who already support him: blacks, illegal immigrants and non-black socialists.
“Any involvement in racial politics has to hurt Obama at his core. It goes to his fundamental selling point: That he is post racial. By dealing with race repeatedly, he is vulnerable just as Bill Clinton was when he had always to deal with sexual scandal. It is not his strength but can ultimately destroy his credibility.” – RACIAL POLITICS BLOWS UP IN OBAMA’S FACE
What has become clear is that this whole racial business really exploded when Obama’s poll numbers started to drop; the Tea Party Movement sprang up and people were starting to wonder how seriously left-of-center Obama truly is. We now have irrefutable proof that President Obama, and his White House, is a secular-socialist-machine. But his supporters don’t like the American people knowing the truth. And so, in order to stifle the truth and in retaliation for telling the truth about Obama, anyone who disagrees with the current administration must therefor be a racist. Or at least that is how the pro-Obama folks want the narrative to run.
But we know this isn’t true and we are all getting sick and tired of the pro-Obama forces using, ad nauseum, the race card anytime anyone disagrees with the President. It is foolish and childish to keep harping on that racist charge.
The Obama White House and Executive Branch will never tolerate overt acts or words of racism from an elected or appointed official. They let their Obama supporters do that dirty work, while they (the Administration) try to appear to take the high ground, to show things as a “teachable moment” and they’re supposed to be the “teachers.”
But teachers are also supposed to set examples. And when it comes to race relations, Barack Obama is no role model. His deceitful and less-than-artful use of the race card, no matter how subtle and coded he attempts it, is wearing thin with the non-black electorate. Racism is like pornography of the worst kind: it is dirty, ugly and has no place in the lives of good thinking Americans. But it is not always clearly definable.
But good thinking Americans know it when they see it or hear it. And we’ve seen and heard all we can tolerate from the Obama race card, no matter who is playing it.
Popularity: 1% [?]















No Responses to “Blacks vs. Non-Blacks: Race Relations Forever Fractured? Part 1”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks